Skip to content

Update bcprov-jdk18on to 1.85.2 - #1152

Open
scala-steward wants to merge 1 commit into
adzerk:masterfrom
scala-steward:update/bcprov-jdk18on-1.85.2
Open

Update bcprov-jdk18on to 1.85.2#1152
scala-steward wants to merge 1 commit into
adzerk:masterfrom
scala-steward:update/bcprov-jdk18on-1.85.2

Conversation

@scala-steward

@scala-steward scala-steward commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

About this PR

📦 Updates org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on from 1.85 to 1.85.2

Usage

Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

🔍 Files still referring to the old version number

The following files still refer to the old version number (1.85).
You might want to review and update them manually.

project/Dependencies.scala
⚙ Adjust future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.bouncycastle", artifactId = "bcprov-jdk18on" } ]

Or, add this to slow down future updates of this dependency:

dependencyOverrides = [{
  pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
  dependency = { groupId = "org.bouncycastle", artifactId = "bcprov-jdk18on" }
}]
labels: library-update, old-version-remains, commit-count:1

jcazevedo
jcazevedo previously approved these changes Aug 7, 2026
@jcazevedo
jcazevedo enabled auto-merge August 7, 2026 14:34
auto-merge was automatically disabled August 19, 2026 13:48

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@scala-steward
scala-steward force-pushed the update/bcprov-jdk18on-1.85.2 branch from ba53d19 to e1b406d Compare August 19, 2026 13:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants